 |
       |
|
|
|
|
| Become an SVP lifetime member SVPMembership |
 |
| The Do-It-Yourself Unincorporated Business Trust |
|
Topic: Dale Pond
Collected Articles Section: Responses to Dawn Table of Contents to this Topic |
|
> A clarification, please - is syntropic the same as centropic? I was alerted to this by Jeane Manning. She uses syntropy instead of centropy. In looking it up, centropy doesn't really exist as a word. But syntropy does: http://www.onelook.com/ As you no doubt know orthodoxy uses the term "negentropy". > I feel the thirds (as always, right?) play a significant role in the desired dynamics. As I am believing I am coming to understand this concept it is first Thirds, then Sixths and then Ninths. The Creative Source (Thirds) of a tone or sound is composed of three elements. As also the Transmissive form and the Receptive or Attractive centers are the Sixths and Ninths respectively as they are also composed of three elements each. I feel this is correct - John could verify or offer correction to this idea. If he concurs I will go ahead and write an article on it more fully explaining the parts, principles and functions of this working concept of his. So when John says something like "when considering thirds.." he is seeing in his mind's eye the three causative elements of an energy state because he knows the energy state is an effect of the combination of its three causative elements. Unless I'm totally full of it on this..... The Pomoleau/Keely Effect: "The man who cannot occasionally imagine events and conditions of existence that are contrary to the causal principle as he knows it will never enrich his science by the addition of a new idea." - Max Planck > Most of the things you mentioned could be workable, but not the microwave idea. That is not in consonance with Mother Nature, and we need to have her permission to pull something of this Nature off. If you don't work with Her, you work against Her. Not a good idea to work against Her! Just for informational purposes microwaves are not things. A microwave is a given range of vibrations and/or oscillations. So it is a count or rate or number of vibrations and not a thing of itself. Conversely they can be referred to as a certain length (Time) of those waves. They occur above radio waves and just below heat waves on the Electromagnetic Spectrum. > Also, the radical vacuum idea seems like a wrong direction. So, in my way of thinking, I've weeded a couple ideas out, which is progress. Vacuum is not nothingness - it is the ether proper - of a certain type or state. It is also a high state of dispersive/dissociative vibratory conditions which theoretically could sympathetically call water unto itself. Vacuum is simply the other half of the vibration waveform missed and not understood by orthodoxy. PS: "If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?" --Albert Einstein |
| See Also: |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
