 |
       |
|
|
|
|
| Become an SVP lifetime member SVPMembership |
 |
| The Do-It-Yourself Unincorporated Business Trust |
|
Topic: Dale Pond
Collected Articles Section: HHO Systems Table of Contents to this Topic |
|
The Meyer system has not been confirmed to be sufficient to power a vehicle without additional standard chemical fuel. If it has been so verified I've not heard of it. We did run tests on several of these HHO systems resulting in myriads of results - not all expected. There are more physics involved than most people would admit: http://svpvril.com/phpbb2/viewforum.php?f=28&sid=032abad4d4bd4dd9228be333fbd7edad There are many people around the globe working on HHO systems to ENHANCE standard chemical fuel use - not replace it. In other words these systems are designed to increase fuel mileage. Therefore arguments about efficiency of the HHO systems are not valid. If the goal were to use them to REPLACE standard chemical fuels then they would be in part correct. The other part of the error is to wrongly assume these HHO systems use the standard electrolysis process. The more efficient systems (that I've seen) are not using the standard electrolysis process but are modified electrolytic systems sometimes greatly modified. On the other hand there are efforts around the world to replace the standard fuel use process in vehicles. With all these pioneer experimenters "doing their thing" without interference from The System will eventually produce positive results. If we've learned anything during the past year is we cannot, indeed should not, believe anything whatsoever coming from any portion of The System whether it be political, religious or scientific. History is filled with stories of renegade free-thinking inventors inventing the "impossible" and thoroughly upsetting the status quo. We are in a world-wide Science Revolution that will forever change society. |
| See Also: |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
